Thursday, December 14, 2006


To my Muslim Sisters.

I found this as I was browsing through IslamOnline.net. I had a hearty chuckle when I read an article declaring Malaysia to be 'the image of an ideal Muslim country.' If that were the case, then why do most of its citizens not understand the meaning of the hijab, and how it's crux is a religious, not a misogynistic one?

(Direct reference to Kelantan's hijab reinforcement and the biased media hoopla that ensued.)

(And I do not believe the ancient and overused agnostic view that religion is excused sexism, so you can't argue with me using that stance.)

Anyhow, this was an interesting insight into what others think of us. I always have been particularly curious about what the typical non-Muslim Australian sees us, especially when the male ones tend to give us way more space and respect than we're used to in our homeland.

Maybe this is how they see us:

By Joanna Francis

Writer, Journalist - USA

Between the Israeli assault on Lebanon and the Zionist "war on terror," the Muslim world is now center stage in every American home. I see the carnage, death and destruction that have befallen Lebanon, but I also see something else: I see you. I can't help but notice that almost every woman I see is carrying a baby or has children around her. I see that though they are dressed modestly, their beauty still shines through. But it's not just outer beauty that I notice. I also notice that I feel something strange inside me: I feel envy. I feel terrible for the horrible experiences and war crimes that the Lebanese people have suffered, being targeted by our common enemy. But I can't help but admire your strength, your beauty, your modesty, and most of all, your happiness.

Yes, it's strange, but it occurred to me that even under constant bombardment, you still seemed happier than we are, because you were still living the natural lives of women. The way women have always lived since the beginning of time. It used to be that way in the West until the 1960s, when we were bombarded by the same enemy. Only we were not bombarded with actual munitions, but with subtle trickery and moral corruption.

Through Temptation

They bombarded us Americans from Hollywood, instead of from fighter jets or with our own American-made tanks. They would like to bomb you in this way too, after they've finished bombing the infrastructure of your countries. I do not want this to happen to you. You will feel degraded, just like we do. You can avoid this kind of bombing if you will kindly listen to those of us who have already suffered serious casualties from their evil influence. Because everything you see coming out of Hollywood is a pack of lies, a distortion of reality, smoke and mirrors. They present casual sex as harmless recreation because they aim to destroy the moral fabric of the societies into which they beam their poisonous programming. I beg you not to drink their poison. There is no antidote for it once you have consumed it. You may recover partially, but you will never be the same. Better to avoid the poison altogether than to try to heal from the damage it causes.

They will try to tempt you with their titillating movies and music videos, falsely portraying us American women as happy and satisfied, proud of dressing like prostitutes, and content without families. Most of us are not happy, trust me. Millions of us are on anti-depressant medication, hate our jobs, and cry at night over the men who told us they loved us, then greedily used us and walked away. They would like to destroy your families and convince you to have fewer children. They do this by presenting marriage as a form of slavery, motherhood as a curse, and being modest and pure as old-fashioned. They want you to cheapen yourself and lose your faith. They are like the Serpent tempting Eve with the apple. Don't bite.

Self-Value

I see you as precious gems, pure gold, or the "pearl of great value" spoken of in the Bible (Matthew 13: 45). All women are pearls of great value, but some of us have been deceived into doubting the value of our purity. Jesus said: "Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you" (Matthew 7: 6). Our pearls are priceless, but they convince us that they're cheap. But trust me; there is no substitute for being able to look in the mirror and seeing purity, innocence and self-respect staring back at you.

The fashions coming out of the Western sewer are designed to make you believe that your most valuable asset is your sexuality. But your beautiful dresses and veils are actually sexier than any Western fashion, because they cloak you in mystery and show self-respect and confidence. A woman's sexuality should be guarded from unworthy eyes, since it should be your gift to the man who loves and respects you enough to marry you. And since your men are still manly warriors, they deserve no less than your best. Our men don't even want purity anymore. They don't recognize the pearl of great value, opting for the flashy rhinestone instead. Only to leave her too!

Your most valuable assets are your inner beauty, your innocence, and everything that makes you who you are. But I notice that some Muslim women push the limit and try to be as Western as possible, even while wearing a veil (with some of their hair showing). Why imitate women who already regret, or will soon regret, their lost virtue? There is no compensation for that loss. You are flawless diamonds. Don't let them trick you into becoming rhinestones. Because everything you see in the fashion magazines and on Western television is a lie. It is Satan's trap. It is fool's gold.

A Woman's Heart

I'll let you in on a little secret, just in case you're curious: pre-marital sex is not even that great. We gave our bodies to the men we were in love with, believing that that was the way to make them love us and want to marry us, just as we had seen on television growing up. But without the security of marriage and the sure knowledge that he will always stay with us, it's not even enjoyable! That's the irony. It was just a waste. It leaves you in tears.

Speaking as one woman to another, I believe that you understand that already. Because only a woman can truly understand what's in another woman's heart. We really are all alike. Our race, religion or nationalities do not matter. A woman's heart is the same everywhere. We love. That's what we do best. We nurture our families and give comfort and strength to the men we love. But we American women have been fooled into believing that we are happiest having careers, our own homes in which to live alone, and freedom to give our love away to whomever we choose. That is not freedom. And that is not love.

Only in the safe haven of marriage can a woman's body and heart be safe to love. Don't settle for anything less. It's not worth it. You won't even like it and you'll like yourself even less afterwards. Then he'll leave you.

Self-Denial

Sin never pays. It always cheats you. Even though I have reclaimed my honor, there's still no substitute for having never been dishonored in the first place. We Western women have been brainwashed into thinking that you Muslim women are oppressed. But truly, we are the ones who are oppressed; slaves to fashions that degrade us, obsessed with our weight, begging for love from men who do not want to grow up. Deep down inside, we know that we have been cheated.

We secretly admire and envy you, although some of us will not admit it. Please do not look down on us or think that we like things the way they are. It's not our fault. Most of us did not have fathers to protect us when we were young because our families have been destroyed. You know who is behind this plot.

Don't be fooled, my sisters. Don't let them get you too. Stay innocent and pure. We Christian women need to see what life is really supposed to be like for women. We need you to set the example for us, because we are lost. Hold onto your purity. Remember: you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. So guard your "toothpaste" carefully!

I hope you receive this advice in the spirit in which it is intended: the spirit of friendship, respect, and admiration. From your Christian sister – with love…


* This article is republished with the kind permission of the author. The original can be found onCrescent and the Cross.

Joanna Francis is a writer and journalist. She manages her ownblog.





















Labels: , ,

this has been a rant by Syazwina Saw at 1:29 pm

1 comments

Saturday, November 04, 2006


'That's not hijab.'

Note to MLH:

This is how it should be done.

I bet Ali has some fans now.

Labels: , ,

this has been a rant by Syazwina Saw at 11:57 pm

1 comments

Wednesday, November 01, 2006


Daging and tudung saji.

Assalamualaikum wrh. wbt.

First of all, I would like to apologize if I unintentionally insult any of my audience along the way. I have a tendency to do that. Alhamdulillah, I am not some major public figure. Otherwise, I might get in some hot soup that is so eagerly brewed by the half-witted politicians who (hopefully not for very long) govern this gorgeous land.

Yes. I am referring to Sheikh Taj-el-Din. Or as my people call it, Tajuddin. Which is my uncle's name, incidentally.

Moving on.

I am in no way available for comment on the issue. Mainly because I wasn't there in Lakemba. And also because my first impression of him was that he had said something wrong. But I would like to thank Allah for helping clear my mind on this one, and for letting it be open enough to field all sorts of opinions from left and right.

First of all, let me state that the current Australian government is unashamedly right-wing (from my little understanding of Australian politics, that is). They, for the most part, have unquestionably racist views of how Australian should be (do Google for 'John Howard, racist comment, Islam, Arabs', and you'll get the picture), and they refuse to actually listen to their people which really defies the whole idea of democracy (as my Bio lecturer so graciously indicated in his retirement rant about David Hicks being undefended by his country, peppered with Australian expletives and plenty of the f-word). Howard and Costello should shut their yanks from going on and on about how so-and-so nation is not democratic, and start getting scared about Beazley winning this one. Because if they continue with the chaos they're spinning and mucking around with, and not take back some of the more idiotic things they have done to the people of Australia, then Beazley seems to be the sure-winner in this one.

Howard and Co. have certainly no love from Victorian university students, what with us bearing the painful brunt of VSU. The majority of us, anyway.

Secondly, I have deduced from a prolonged observation, that the Australian people are a pragmatically emotional lot. That may sound paradoxical to you, but trust me, that's what they are. They tend to be let by their emotions, but within the limits of logic and political-correctness. And so if they are upset, they will most certainly show it. But with carefully-measured restrain.

Again, Howard seems to be the sole exception to this rule.

And now to the point. I have decided to give the two cents of others' here, in hopes that what little virtual audience I have will rest assured, that the Mufti of Australia and NZ is not a masochistic caveman from some long-ago culture, but that he has merely been, as so many Hollywood and Malaykayu (geddit?) personas call it,

"Misquoted".

Do read with an open mind what I get from MUIS-news:

"I agree to everything you have said so far- it is 100% correct and
>true. However, i ask you all- how many of you know verbatim what
>Sheikh AlHilaly said? how many of you can correctly quote him word
>for word? how many of you were present when he gave the Islamic
>lesson on the fourth day of Ramadan after Taraweeh? why are we
>always condemning the media for manipulation and misconstruing and
>misquoting and misinterpreting yet this time we are taking their
>side and believing their claims? well allow me to clear everything
>up for you.
>
>I heard Sheikh Alhilaly on that night at Lakemba mosque after
>taraweeh prayers,& and i heard his khutba this afternoon and i heard
>him explaining yet again this evening on The Voice of Islam and i
>assure you if you would call up and ask for a transcript of his
>latest interview, asked for a recording, or asked any member of the
>public who heard him tonight and understood him you will be
>confident of what i am about to inform you. The incident which
>instigated this whole debacle was, as i mentioned previously, an
>Islamic lesson on two sections of two verses of the Quran;
>"assaariko wassaarikato' (the thief and the thiefess) and
>"azzaniyato wazzaniy" (the adulteress and adulterer) (surah An-noor
>verse 2). he was explaining to a muslim audience the Islamic purpose
>regarding why in the first verse Allah started by mentioning the
>male criminal while in the second verse he started by mentioning the
>female criminal. the second verse was in reference to ADULTERY
>(unlawful sexual intercourse) NOT RAPE. and he went on to state that
>an adulteress or a prostitute is "USUALLY" the one who instigates or
>excites the male adulterer by wearing immodest and revealing
>clothing.
>
>Let me remind you that he was addressing an entirely muslim audience
>and his words were intended for muslim women. now, allow me to
>re-iterate HE WAS TALKING ABOUT ADULTERY and NOT RAPE. he then went
>on to make an analogy in reference to another topic entirely- hijab
>(or head scarf) and rape. and he asked his audience that if they
>were to leave a piece of meat in their backyard would it not attract
>cats? and they said yes and he said if you put it in your front yard
>would it still attract cats and they replied in the affirmative and
>then he asked them "what about if you covered this piece of meat?
>would the cats smell it or even go near it?" and they replied in the
>negative as i am sure& you would too.
>
>Let me clarify he was talking TO muslim women ABOUT muslim women and
>regarding their attire and was encouraging the wearing of the veil
>for ones protection IN HIS COMMUNITY. he did not REPEAT did NOT
>refer to non-muslim women in any form or manner, he did NOT condone
>the criminal act of rape , in fact he likened rapists to feral
>ANIMALS and he was quoted as saying ""I would like to unequivocally
>confirm that the presentation related to religious teachings on
>modesty and not to go to extremes in enticements, this does not
>condone rape," he explained. "I condemn rape and reiterate that this
>is a capital crime."

>
>Maybe this needs to be highlighted and posted in size 36 font. so,
>before we go ahead and join in the universal slander of one of our
>highly respected and learned sheikhs maybe we should make sure we
>have the correct information and listen to his side of the story and
>not blindly believe what the media presents us with, as Allah SWT
>said [surah alhujuraat verse 6];" ya ayoha alatheena aamano in
>jaa'akom fasiqon binaba'in fatabayanoo an tuseebo qawman bijahalatin
>fatusbi7o 3ala ma fa3altom nadimeen" (O you who believe! If a lier
>comes to you with any news, verify it, lest you should harm people
>in ignorance, and afterwards you become regretful for what you have
>done). after what evidence you have been presented with, do you
>believe that such a man deserves the avalanche of abuse, reprisal
>and condemnation that is unfortunately coming from our fellow Muslim
>brothers and sisters who undoubtedly have formulated their opinions
>based on the lies and deception of the popular media? does such a
>man deserve to be thrown out of office for merely explaining a
>section of the quraan? an why is it that an incident that occurred
>almost 1 month ago is only brought to the public forefront now? is
>it to draw attention away from another scandalous affair? i leave
>you to make up your own minds- but please ensure that you choose
>reliable resources and may Allah guide us all to the truth and
>righteous path. Ameen
>
>Your sister in Islam,
>Rania Abdou.


And from the man himself:

The sheikh's statement
>>> 31Oct06
>>> In full of a statement issued last night by Sheik Taj Aldin
>>> Alhilali entitled ``Explanatory Statement by the Mufti El-Hilali
>>> regarding the recent media campaign'':
>>> I would like to outline clearly and plainly some of the facts and
>>> basics that formulate my faith, belief and my understanding of the
>>> teachings of the true religion of Islam.
>>> 1.
The crime of rape against any woman is an abominable crime; it
>>> has no justification, and the perpetrator deserves the severest
>>> punishment and would not deserve to belong to a religion or to
>>> humanity.
>>> 2. Women in Australia or any other western society are free to wear
>>> what they like, and no Muslim has the right to dictate the rulings
>>> of his religion on others.
While non-Muslim women can cover or
>>> reveal whatever they choose of their bodies, Islamic Shari'a made
it
>>> incumbent upon Muslim men to lower their gaze. It is prohibited for
>>> them to stare at the beauty of strange women.
>>> 3. It is my duty as a religious leader to advise Muslim women to
>>> adhere to and abide by the Islamic dress code. Having said that,
>>> Muslim women are free to comply with or reject my advice, and their
>>> reckoning will be with Allah the Almighty.
>>> 4. By saying the "exposed meat" displayed in a degrading way is a
>>> simile for a woman making herself subject to abuse by men with
>>> diseased souls whose animalistic instincts will overcome them
>>> whereby they would abandon their humanity, mind and religion. These
>>> men are responsible for their crime.
>>> 5.
The metaphor I used of the "exposed meat" was not appropriate
for
>>> the western mentality. It has been quoted and misinterpreted by
some
>>> groups with ill intentions. This metaphor was used in a private
>>> lesson given inside the mosque after the Taraweeh (optional night)
>>> prayers on the fourth day of Ramadan. It was meant for the Muslim
>>> attendees at the mosque and not the general public and particularly
>>> not the general women of our Australian society.
>>> Apart from the above-mentioned facts, I would like to make it known
>>> to all my brothers and sisters in and out of Australia that:
>>> After the Taraweeh (optional night) prayers on 27/09/2006 at the
>>> Lakemba Mosque in Sydney, Australia, I gave a lesson to the members
>>> of the Islamic community of Australia, the title of which was: "Why
>>> did Allah, the Almighty, mention 'man' before 'woman' in the crime
>>> of theft? as is quoted in the Quran: ((As for) the thief, the male
>>> and the female, ...) (Al-Ma-idah 5.38) while he mentioned 'woman'
>>> before 'man' in the crime of adultery?, as is quoted in the Quran:
>>> (The woman and the man found guilty of adultery or fornication,...)
>>> (An-Nur 24.2)".
>>> This lesson lasted approximately 15 minutes, 10 minutes of these
>>> were spent on explaining the meaning of the first verse, and the
>>> remaining time was spent on giving advice and guidance relating to
>>> the way a woman dresses and the methods of seduction and the beauty
>>> given to her by the Almighty Allah. I emphasised that exceeding the
>>> limits in this regard is dangerous to both men and women; and that
>>> the devil exploits these charms of seduction to tempt both men and
>>> women to commit adultery and fornication. In this case, both men
and
>>> women are committing a sin. So
the topic did not deal with the
crime
>>> of rape.
>>> At the end of the lesson when I was explaining the reason why
>>> 'woman' was mentioned before 'man' in the verse dealing with the
>>> crime of adultery, I said it was because she possessed the charm,
>>> the methods of seduction and all similar devices given to her by
>>> Allah to tempt the man. For that
I borrowed a metaphor used by an
>>> author called Ar-Rifa'i. He said exposing the meat in an illicit
way
>>> would encourage the cats to devour it. I didn't mean by that to
>>> humiliate immodest women; I meant to censure the person who would
>>> abandon his humility and turn into a vicious animal; and there's a
>>> big difference between a cat's behaviour and that of a human's, as
>>> the latter is commanded and responsible for their actions.
>>> I confess that this analogy is inappropriate and unacceptable for
>>> the Australian society and the western society in general.
>>> I am deeply saddened and distressed by the acts of some devious
>>> groups which lurk in the dark watching me, and who cannot tolerate
>>> the moderate, balanced way which I adopt to advocate for women's
>>> issues, national harmony and co-existence, and to hold fast to the
>>> love of our Australian home, to protect it from all forms of
extreme
>>> thoughts and to reject all acts of violence and any act that
>>> breaches the rule of law.
>>> Yes, I feel deeply saddened that such an ordinary lesson has been
>>> used to slander and defame me after it had been translated with the
>>> ill intention of dubious media that wishes to incite and they
>>> present an unfair campaign, the aims of which are very well known.
>>>
Once again, I turn to all the women of Australia and the world. You
>>> are the shining lights of the world, you are more than half of the
>>> society, and you are the daughters, the sisters, the mothers and
the
>>> aunts. How could any sane person think of humiliating you?
>>> You are the cherished pearls, the dearest thing in the world. So
>>> don't be taken as offerings at the temples of the merchants of
>>> pleasure, or advocates of decadence and corruption.
>>> Each one of us is responsible for accounting for his or her own
>>> actions before he or she is asked about them by the almighty Allah
>>> (on the Day of Judgment). Once again I am very sorry and apologise
>>> for what resulted from an unintentional analogy.
>>> With all my respect to the women of the world.
>>> In due course I will take the necessary decision that shall lift
the
>>> pressures that have been placed on our Australian Muslim community
>>> and that which will benefit all Australians.
>>> The pressure of the last couple of days has had an obvious effect
on
>>> my health and well-being. I ask the public to give my family and I
>>> some privacy, time and space to recover.
I have also asked for
>>> indefinite leave from my duties at Lakemba mosque.

>>> Sincerely,
>>> Sheikh Taj El-Deen El-Hilali
>>> Mufti Of Australia
Credit goes to my sister Shabia A.M. and brother Shiraz Ali-Patel (secretary of MUIS 2006) for extracting the respective letters. Jazakumullahu khayr.

Wassalamualaikum.

Labels: , , , ,

this has been a rant by Syazwina Saw at 11:20 am

0 comments

Tuesday, October 31, 2006


Legendary. Sure. Right. Whatever.

Assalamualaikum wrh. wbt.

I have heard many myths about the land I consider my hometown, Kelantan (or Pasir Mas, if you're into specifics).

Among them are that Kelantanese only enjoy sweet cooking i.e. substitute salt for sugar.

(Ardently agreed upon by many of my ukhti during our routine sojourns in the kitchen.)

Well. I can't tell the diff, since I grew up with a Kelantanese tongue, anyway. I still feel other states have sweeter foods, and that they're more obsessed with sirap (bandung optional), which I still can't understand to this day.

(Why sirap ros with everything?)

And another infamous one is that Kelantanese women are the depiction of the Malay ideal for beauty, i.e. fair-skinned, hidung mancung, nicely-figured, impeccable bone structure, etc.

Which I find completely ridiculous. Although I have photographic evidence that the following traits do lie in my bloodline. I just didn't get any of the genes. Or maybe I did, but they are all recessive, when compared to the more dominant alleles from my father's typically Chinese genome. Or maybe there's some sort of pleiotropy, or masking of the genes, involved in the makings of me.

Allahu'alam.

(My Genetics paper is first up next week. Do pray for me.)

I am quite syukur with what I have, thanks. Astigmatism, or no astigmatism.

But what I find disturbing is that as a nation, we're so obsessed with beauty. And I'm not talking about the deep-instilled, beauty from within kind. Oh no sirree.

I'm talking about the stereotypical kind aforementioned above.

It's sad and degrading, to want to be known, merely for how you look.
It's as if they don't even understand that women are not mere sex objects, and that we want to be acknowledged for what we do, and not what we look like.
Don't they know that the face can mask such ugliness that lies within?
How much can a person be satisfied by looks and physical charm?

Which is why I feel the hijab, and especially the niqab (for those who prefer it), is a tool for liberation. Because I've seen the effect it gives on people (esp. men) around me (i.e. in Australia, where donning the hijab actually earns you unspoken respect, unlike in LITW), who view it as a shield of sorts between me and non-hijabis. Because guys can't oogle over my dress size, they choose to sit up and listen when I speak.

(The politically correct ones, anyway)

Their view of me is based on what I can do, rather than how I look. Or at the very least, it does not overshadow my capabilities as a functioning human being. Which is very liberating for a teenaged girl.

Feminists should try it, instead of not shaving. Much more hygienic.

But seriously. I think that us hijabis also forget this underlying law of donning the hijab:

That it's only when we choose to not really care (as much) over what we look like, that others will do the same.

And yet we should always remember that as muslimah, Allah likes us to be neat and presentable and clean. And that we can be beautiful, but not in a showy kind of way.

"Is this too tabarruj?"

And when we understand what beauty truly means, we can work towards it, insyaAllah.

Wassalamualaik.

Labels: , ,

this has been a rant by Syazwina Saw at 4:05 pm

0 comments

Friday, October 13, 2006


Why the hijab?

Assalamualaikum wrh. wbt.

This fellow blogger I know has come out of his shell with the most interesting things to say. Maybe all that time spent away from his old blog has created something of a surge in thoughts.

Allahu'alam.

But let's all help him, here. As a 'curious male', he wants to know why people wear the hijab.

I welcome some people to even tell him why they don't wear the hijab. Add some perspective to the issue.

And I'm only promoting the link because I've thought of it for some time. But I haven't had the gall or maybe the right words, to actually ask the questions.

And although what I would say would be rather different from his words, I think the underlying message is pretty much the same.

Only I am too chicken to get the flak and sound all better-than-thou about the issue. :D

Wassalamualaikum.

Labels: , ,

this has been a rant by Syazwina Saw at 3:36 pm

1 comments